People Are Criticising ICC For The ‘Boundary Rule’ As England Snatched Victory From NZ In WC Final

Ira Shukla

Not a single person watching the World Cup final last night, would have thought that the match will end in a draw TWO times.

Batting first, New Zealand scored 241 and in return, England scored 241 as well. Unbelievable scenes followed when the match went to the super-over and both teams scored 15 runs.

To decide the winner, the authorities went for the ‘boundary rule’. Which meant that the team which hit more boundaries during the match was declared victorious.  

And it was England. Hitting 24 boundaries compared to New Zealand’s 16, they were given the trophy. 

While it was a historic moment for their fans, a lot of people – including cricket greats – think that it is unfair for the rules to be favouring the batsmen so heavily. 

Looks like the ICC has a lot of answering to do.

You might also like
5 IPL Players Who Made Franchise Owners Sweat At The Auction Table This Year
Meet Vaibhav Suryavanshi, The 13-Year-Old-Bihar Boy Who Just Became IPL’s Youngest Crorepati
The Salaries Of Indian Players From Their First IPL Season Vs Now
The Internet Is Asking – Was It Fair To Give The Coaching Job To Gautam Gambhir?
India’s Embarrassing 46 Against NZ! Other Teams Who Scored Even Lower In Test Matches
Virat Kohli Gave Shakib Al Hasan The Best Retirement Gift, And It’s A Goodbye We Won’t Forget